Τρώτε περισσότερα φυτά για καλύτερη υγεία & για ανάταση του κλίματος της Γης
"Τρώτε περισσότερα φυτά για καλύτερη υγεία & για ανάταση του κλίματος της Γης" Ερευνητές στην Μ. Βρετανία εξέδωσαν πόνημα ερευνητικό που καταδεικνύει αναμφίβολα το γεγονός οτι το να ενστερνιστεί οιοσδήποτε ενα φυτοφαγικό τρόπο ζωής δεν ωφελεί άμεσα τον εαυτό του και τους γύρω του αλλά και το οικοσύστημα στο οποίο είμαστε πάροικοι, παρεπίδημοι και ξένοι.. Η έρευνα δείχνει ότι οι εκπομπές διοξειδίου άνθρακα μπορούν να ελαττωθούν έως και 40% ! Οι ρύποι παγκοσμίως πρόκειται να φτάσουν έως το 2050 από τους 2.20 γιγατόνους σε 4.10 γιγατόνους και αυτό λέει αρκετά για το πόσο σοφοί οφείλουμε να γίνουμε σε μάλλον μικρότερο χρονικό διάστημα από όσο μας αρμόζει πλέον.. Η έρευνα τίθεται παρακάτω στα Αγγλικά δημοσιευμένη στο Scientific American Με εκτίμηση, Δρ.Μουρουτης Κων/νος
Eat More Plants to Improve Health, Combat Climate Change
U.K. researchers find changed diets could substantially cut greenhouse gas pollution and benefit health
A large body of research has found switching to an
entirely vegetarian
diet would make a huge
difference on the carbon footprint
of our food
system.
Cut back on the beef, dairy, sweets and savory snacks, but feel free
to munch away on more fruits, vegetables and cereals, if you’d like a
more climate-friendly and healthy diet, according to recent research conducted by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
The changes—which the authors note are ultimately “relatively minor”
and “realistic”—could cut greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent. It
should be noted the studies were focused in the United Kingdom.
It may seem straightforward, but James Milner, a lecturer in the
department of social and environmental health research at the London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and one of the co-authors of the
research, said the goal of this work was not to ask “what if” questions
related to changes in diets and how that could affect emissions, but
instead map current consumer behavior to determine where changes could
be made that wouldn’t be radically different.
For example, a large body of research has found switching to an
entirely vegetarian diet would make a huge difference on the carbon
footprint of our food system—the Climate Change, Agriculture and Food
Security research program reports that if the global population were to
reduce or cut its meat intake, it would halve the cost of mitigation
actions needed to stabilize carbon dioxide levels to 450 parts per
million by midcentury—but for many people that is not in the cards.
“This is interesting but in reality most people somewhere like the
U.K. simply don’t want to become vegetarian,” Milner said in an email.
Even if the average U.K. citizen were to fall in line with dietary
guidelines set forth by the World Health Organization (which most do
not), the study estimates there would be a 17 percent reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions.
For those not concerned about the parts per million of CO2 produced
by the food they buy, a second paper using the same data calculated the
health impacts of altering diets and concluded a switch to WHO
guidelines would save almost 7 million years of lives lost prematurely
in the United Kingdom over the next three decades.
On an individual level, the average life expectancy would increase about 12 months for men and four months for women.
“We wanted to model the health impacts because this would help us to
understand the trade-offs between benefits for public health, benefits
for the environment, and the likely public acceptability of the modeled
diets as we progressively reduced the emissions,” Milner said.
The researchers collected data from 1,571 food diaries completed by
adults for four days in the United Kingdom to model the average diet and
tweak it to still be appetizing but reduce emissions. On the health
side, researchers modeled the outcomes from dietary changes on stroke,
type 2 diabetes, heart disease, diet-related cancers and life
expectancy.
Milner said the most surprising part of the research was how
substantial the benefits to both health and emissions could be, without
making radical changes to diets. Healthier diets cut developed country CO2 emissions
While eating more fruits, vegetables and cereal is the main takeaway,
the researchers did find some fruits and vegetables were more
emissions-friendly than others. For example, tomatoes are fairly
emissions-intensive, the study notes.
“One thing which was interesting was that to achieve really large GHG
emission reductions, it’s better to make up your total fruit and
vegetable consumption with a greater proportion of vegetables,” Milner
said, but added that’s because most vegetables tend to be associated
with lower emissions. “We also found a health benefit associated with
this. However, it’s important to note that this results is only based on
averages—there is a lot of variation within each group [fruits and
vegetables]. I certainly wouldn’t want to suggest that people shouldn’t
eat fruit!”
Another significant opportunity to effect change on food-system-related greenhouse gas emissions is to decrease food waste.
More than 30 percent of all food-related emissions in the United
States are from uneaten food and spoiled food being tossed out, said
Gregory Keoleian, director of the Center for Sustainable Systems at the
University of Michigan.
In a study released last year in the Journal of Industrial Ecology,
Keoleian and his colleague Martin Heller quantified the emissions of
the American diet. They found the current American diet produces about 5
kilograms of CO2 per day, and 28 percent of that is due to wasted food.
“For food waste, it’s about our consumer behavior,” Keoleian said.
“Don’t order more than you eat, prepare meals at home according to what
your needs are, when you’re shopping don’t overbuy.”
Americans also eat too many calories, and if they are reduced, the emissions burden of our diets decreases, as well.
Keoleian and Heller found if Americans shifted to following the
Agriculture Department’s dietary guidelines, they would consume less
meat—good for emissions—but would drink more milk than they do
currently—bad for emissions.
“Those kind of offset each other,” he added. The authors did find
switching to a lacto-ovo vegetarian diet would result in a 33 percent
decrease in emissions. Vegan diets are 53 percent more efficient. ‘Westernized’ diets in poor countries raise CO2 emissions
Also important to the food emissions sphere is the growing trend of
“westernizing” diets in low- and middle-income countries. As incomes
rise, people are spending more money on adding animal protein, sugars
and processed foods into their diets, which are emissions-intensive.
A study released last November in the journal Nature estimated there will be an 80 percent increase in annual emissions globally just related to this shift in food production.
By 2050, the rise in disposable income will increase emissions from 2.27 gigatons today to 4.10 gigatons globally.
With climate change, food security and sustainability for a growing
population is one of the most critical challenges facing the planet,
Keoleian said, and an area where changes to the food system can have
quantifiable emissions impacts.
“We need to be more efficient in how we manufacture products and grow
food,” he said. “But consumers also have a role in terms of their
choices.”
One challenge to changing dietary choices is finding effective ways
to do it. Milner said it wasn’t a focus of the U.K. research, but an
important area.
He said there are many mechanisms through which dietary changes can
be garnered, like through public awareness campaigns, food processing
regulations, portion size changes and tax policy, but he hopes by
linking the health benefits to dietary changes, the public might take
notice.
“Hopefully, research like ours demonstrates the benefits of linking
public health and sustainability agendas, rather than considering each
separately,” he said. Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500